Income Tax

Is a Resident senior citizen granted exemption from payment of advance tax (Income tax)? ||Advance Tax on Senior Citizen

Payment of advance tax on Senior Citizen

Payment of advance taxAs per section 208 of Income Tax Act, every person whose estimated tax liability for the year is 10,000 Rupees. or more, shall pay his tax in advance, in the form of “advance tax“. However, section 207 of income tax act gives relief from payment of advance tax to a resident senior citizen. As per section 207​ ot this act a resident senior citizen (i.e., an individual of the age of 60 years or above during the relevant financial year) not having any income from profession and business , is not liable to pay advance tax.

Section 208 of Income Tax Act

As per section 208 of Income Tax Act, every person whose estimated tax liability for the year is 10,000 rupees or more, shall pay his tax in advance, in the form of “advance tax”.

Section 207 of Income Tax Act

According to Section 207 of Income Tax Act, a resident senior citizen (an individual of age 60 years or more) who does not have any income from business or profession is not liable to pay advance tax.

Illustration-I

Mr. Sharma (age 64 years and resident) is a retired person, earning rental income of 40,000 Rupees per month. A part from rental income, he does not have any other source of income.

Will Mr. Sharma be liable to pay advance tax?

Any taxpayer whose estimated tax liability for the year exceeds 10,000 rupees has to pay his tax in advance by the due dates prescribed in this regard. However, if a person satisfies the following conditions, Mr. Sharma will not be liable to pay advance tax:

1) He is an individual

2) He is resident in India as per the Income tax Act 1961

3) He is of the age of 60 years or above (senior citizen)

4) He is not having any income from business or profession profession”

In this case Mr. Sharma is a resident as per Income tax Act. His age is 64 years and he  does not have any income from business or profession profession”.

Thus, Mr. Sharma satisfies all the above conditions and, hence, he will not be liable to pay advance tax.

Illustration 2

Mr. Rakesh (resident and age 57 years) is a retired person, earning rental income of 45,000 Rupees per month. Apart from rental income he does not have any other source of income.

Will Mr. Rakesh be liable to pay advance tax?

Any taxpayer whose estimated tax liability for the year exceeds 10,000 Rupees has to pay tax in advance by the due dates prescribed in this regard. However, if a person satisfies the following conditions, then Mr. Rakesh will not be liable to pay advance tax:

1) He is an individual

2) He is resident in India as per the Income tax Act 1961

3) He is of the age of 60 years or above (senior citizen)

4) He does not have any income from business or profession profession”.

In this case Mr. Rakesh is a resident as per Income-tax Act 1961, Rakesh age is 57 years and he is not having income chargeable to tax under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”.

Mr. Rakesh satisfies all the conditions except the age criteria of 60 years and, hence, rakesh will be liable to pay advance tax. In other words, Mr. Rakesh is not a senior citizen as per the Income-tax Act 1961 and, hence, he is not exempted from payment of advance tax.

Other Post
How Many ​Times Can I Revise Income Tax Return
Eligible Business under section 44AD ||Who is eligible and not eligible to take advantage of the presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AD?
What is pre-construction period?||Home loan tax benefit
What are the benefits available in respect of interest on deposits in case of senior citizens? || Income tax benefits to Senior citizens

Advocate Birbal Sharma

Education- M.Com, LL.B, DLL, LLM Practice Courts - Rajasthan High Court, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Intellectual Property Right Attorney Contact Number- 09785037216 Email ID-advocatebirbalsharma@gmail.com

Share
Published by
Advocate Birbal Sharma

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

3 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

3 months ago