Latest Tax News & Updates

Power to Arrest In GST and SAFEGUARDS

Power to Arrest  [Section 69]

Where the Goods and Service tax Commissioner has reasons to believe that a person has committed any offence specified in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 132 of GST Act which is punishable under clause (i) or (ii) of sub-section (1), or sub-section (2) of the said section, he may, by order, authorise any officer of central tax to arrest such person. [Section 69 (1)]  

(clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 132 See Page No-23 of GST MAGAZINE UPDATE MONTH OF FAB-2020 (DIGITAL) || INSPECTION, SEARCH, SEIZURE, ARREST & PUNISHMENT SPECIAL )

When offence is cognizable and non-bailable:- Where a person is arrested under sub-section (1) for an offence specified under subsection (5) of section 132 of GST Act, the officer authorised to arrest the person shall inform such person of the grounds of arrest and produce him before a Magistrate within 24 (twenty-four) hours.[Section 69 (2)]

SAFEGUARDS- (Non- cognizable and Bailable):-

Subject to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,[Section 69 (3)]––

  • where a person is arrested under sub-section (1) for any offence specified under sub-section (4) of section 132 of this act, he shall be admitted to bail or in default of bail, forwarded to the custody of the Magistrate;
  • in the case of a bailable and  non-cognizable offence, the GST Deputy Commissioner or the GST Assistant Commissioner of shall, for the purpose of releasing an arrested person on bail or otherwise, have the same powers and be subject to the same provisions as an in charge officer of a police station.

IN the case of D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal 1997 (1) SCC 416, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has laid down specific guidelines required to be while making arrests. See GST MAGAZINE UPDATE MONTH OF FAB-2020 (DIGITAL) || INSPECTION, SEARCH, SEIZURE, ARREST & PUNISHMENT SPECIAL )

[visibility visible_on=”desktop”][/visibility][news_box style=”1″ link=”Latest Post” link_target=”_blank” show_more=”on”][highlight][/highlight]

Advocate Birbal Sharma

Education- M.Com, LL.B, DLL, LLM Practice Courts - Rajasthan High Court, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Intellectual Property Right Attorney Contact Number- 09785037216 Email ID-advocatebirbalsharma@gmail.com

Share
Published by
Advocate Birbal Sharma

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

2 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

2 months ago