Can remuneration received by spouse of an individual be clubbed with his/her Income/ income tax return?

Can remuneration received by spouse of an individual be clubbed with his/her Income

CLUBBING OF INCOME IN INCOME TAX ACT– Under certain circumstances as given in section 64(1)(ii) of Income tax law, remuneration /salary received by the spouse of an individual from a concern in which the individual is having substantial interest is clubbed with the income of the individual in Income tax Return. Provisions in this regard are as following:

  • The individual is having substantial interest in a concern/case.
  • Spouse(husband/wife) of the individual is employed in the concern in which the individual is having substantial interest.
  • The spouse of the individual is employed without any technical or professional knowledge or experience (Remuneration/Salary is not justifiable).

    (*) An individual shall be deemed to have substantial interest in any concern, if such individual alone or along with his relatives (as per income tax act) beneficially holds at any time during the previous year are flowing
    • in case of a company –20% or more of the equity shares

                  or is entitled to

                   in case of concern other than a company 20% of profit .

Relative Means for this purpose includes husband/wife, brother/sister or lineal ascendantor descendent of that individual [ section 2(41) of Income tax act].

Example-1

Mr. Mohan is beneficially holding 21% equity shares of Apple Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Mrs. Mohan is employed as Manager (in accounts department) in Apple Minerals Pvt. Ltd. at a monthly salary of Rs. 74,000. Mrs. Mohan is not having any knowledge, experience or no any qualification in the field of accountancy. Will the remuneration/ salary) received by Mrs. Mohan be clubbed with the income of Mr. Mohan?

**

In this situation, Mr. Mohan is having substantial interest in Apple Minerals Pvt. Ltd. and remuneration of Mrs. Mohan is not justifiable (i.e., she is employed without any technical or professional knowledge or experience) and, hence, salary received by Mrs. Raja from Apple Minerals Pvt. Ltd. will be clubbed with the income of Mr. Mohan and will be taxed in the hands of Mr. Mohan.

Example-2

Mrs. Sharma is beneficially holding 30% equity shares of AM Construction Pvt. Ltd. Mr. Sharma is an architect and he is employed as site observer of one of the construction sites of the AM Construction Pvt. Ltd. at a monthly salary of Rs. 38,400. The remuneration/salary received by Mr. Sharma is justifiable considering his knowledge, experience and qualification. Will the remuneration received by Mr. Sharma be clubbed with the income of Mrs. Sharma because she is having substantial interest in AM Construction Pvt. Ltd.?

**

In this situation, Mrs. Sharma is having substantial interest in AM Construction Pvt. Ltd., but Mr. Sharma is deputed on the basis of his knowledge, experience and qualification and, hence, remuneration/salary paid to him is justifiable. The clubbing provisions of section 64(1)(ii) of income tax act​​ apply only in a case where spouse is deputed without any technical or professional knowledge or experience. In this case, the remuneration/Salary of spouse is justifiable, hence, salary received by Mr. Sharma will not be clubbed with the income of Mrs. Sharma but will be taxed in his hands. ​

Other Posts

Gift Exempt from tax

Relief under section 89

Scope of assessment under section 143(1)

Presumptive Taxation Scheme of section 44AD

(If you liked the Article, please Subscribe )

[email-subscribers namefield=”YES” desc=”” group=”Public”]

 

Advocate Birbal Sharma

Education- M.Com, LL.B, DLL, LLM Practice Courts - Rajasthan High Court, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Intellectual Property Right Attorney Contact Number- 09785037216 Email ID-advocatebirbalsharma@gmail.com

Recent Posts

Paid Post

TransactionsTransaction IDInvoice IDPlanPayment GatewayPayment TypeTransaction StatusUsed coupon CodeUsed coupon DiscountPayment DateThere is no any Transactions…

10 months ago

STATE’S POWER TO AMEND VAT LAW AFTER GST HELD ULTRA VIRES : SUPREME COURT

STATE'S POWER TO AMEND VAT LAW AFTER GST HELD ULTRA VIRES: SUPREME COURT  REPORTABLE IN…

10 months ago

REFUND UNDER INVERTED DUTY STRUCTURE: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF RULE 89(5) OF CGST RULES

REFUND UNDER INVERTED DUTY STRUCTURE: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF RULE 89(5) OF CGST…

10 months ago

RAJASTHAN AAR-BILL-TO-SHIP-TO PERMISSIBLE; E-WAY BILL ALLOWED; VALUE DETERMINED UNDER SECTION 15 & RULE 28

RAJASTHAN AAR-BILL-TO-SHIP-TO PERMISSIBLE; E-WAY BILL ALLOWED; VALUE DETERMINED UNDER SECTION 15 & RULE 28 RAJASTHAN…

10 months ago

LEASE PREMIUM ON INDUSTRIAL UNITS; NO RULING AS APPLICANT WITHDRAWS CASE: RAJASTHAN AAR

LEASE PREMIUM ON INDUSTRIAL UNITS; NO RULING AS APPLICANT WITHDRAWS CASE: RAJASTHAN AAR RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY…

10 months ago

LIABILITY TO PAY GST UNDER REVERSE CHARGE MECHANISM ON FREIGHT PAID FOR TRANSPORTATION OF COTTON SEED OIL CAKE

LIABILITY TO PAY GST UNDER REVERSE CHARGE MECHANISM ON FREIGHT PAID FOR TRANSPORTATION OF COTTON…

10 months ago