Corporate Law
![Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff on Date of Brand Use Even Without Written Statement on Record: Supreme Court in Shabu KN Achary v. Dharampal Premchand Limited [2026 INSC 819]](/assets/images/article-corporate.svg)
Corporate Law
Supreme Court holds that in a trademark infringement suit the defendant may ask the plaintif...
Corporate Law
Supreme Court declines to interfere with the High Court's finding that PepsiCo's infringemen...
Corporate Law
Supreme Court leaves open whether a buyer can independently invoke the Arbitration Act again...
Corporate Law
Supreme Court holds that a consultant shareholder who did not sign the Memorandum of Settlem...
Corporate Law
Where the same parties had disputes under two optical fibre contracts and a cross-project se...
Corporate Law
The Supreme Court held that an NBFC's repossession of a borrower's truck at night by breakin...
Corporate Law
The Supreme Court upheld the finding that IQuest's statement was not an undertaking, but hel...
Corporate Law
Supreme Court upholds the Bombay High Court's setting aside of a majority arbitral award tha...
Corporate Law
Supreme Court holds that disputes under a JVA and MoU with Mumbai-seated arbitration clauses...
Corporate Law
Supreme Court holds, prima facie, that later-inducted partners who did not sign the 1985 par...
Corporate Law
Supreme Court allows IIM Jammu to take part in the arbitration between CPWD and the contract...
Corporate Law
On consent of all parties, the Supreme Court allows the Committee of Creditors of Think and ...