(1) Where an offence committed by a person under GST Act is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence under GST Act and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly this act.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of this section (Section 137), where an offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any negligence on the part of, any director of company, manager of company, secretary of company or any other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or any other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly this Act.
Also Option Available
(3) Where an offence under this Act has been committed by a taxable person being a partnership firm or a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) or a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) or a trust. the partner of firm or karta of HUF or managing trustee shall be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly and the provisions of sub-section (2) of this Section shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to such persons.
(4) Nothing contained in Section 137 of this Act shall render any such person liable to any punishment provided in GST Act, if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence of this act.
Explanation. ––For the purposes of this section 137, ––
Power to Arrest In GST and SAFEGUARDS
[news_box style=”1″ title=”Latest Post” link_target=”_blank” show_more=”on” header_background=”#afafaf” header_text_color=”#871d1d”]
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…
Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…
Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…
SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON PRE-IMPORT CONDITIONS AND IGST EXEMPTIONS: SUPREME COURT REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME…
SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON THE LEVY OF GST ON OCEAN FREIGHT: GST COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS REPORTABLE…
MANPOWER SUPPLY UNDER SAC 99851 NOT EXEMPT – ONLY FARM LABOUR UNDER HEADING 9986 ELIGIBLE…