Case Name: M/s. The Poona Club Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA- 123/2019-20/B-12
Date of Judgement/Order: 31/01/2022
Therefore, in view of the amended Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, we find that the applicant club and its members are distinct persons and the fees received by the applicant, from its members are nothing but consideration received for supply of goods/services as a separate entity. The principles of mutuality, which has been cited by the applicant to support its contention that it is not rendering any supply to its members and GST is not leviable on the fees collected from its members, is not applicable in view of the amended Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, the applicant has to pay GST on the said amounts received from its members.
Question 1: – Whether membership fee collected from members at the time of giving membership is liable to tax under CGST/SGST Act?
Answer: – Answered in the affirmative.
Question 2: – Whether the annual subscription and annual games fee collected from members of club is liable to tax under CGST/SGST Act?
Answer: – Answered in the affirmative.
जानिए अतीत की दण्ड व्यवस्था क्या थी |Know what was the punishment system of the past in india भारत में दण्ड के विकास की यात्रा अत्यंत लम्बी है | भारत की दण्ड व्यवस्था के निर्मम एवं बर्बर दण्ड से परिवीक्षा एवं भर्तसना जैसे सुधारात्मक दण्ड तक का सफ़र तय किया है | अतीत की दण्ड…
POWER OF A JUDGE TO PUT QUESTIONS TO ANY WITNESS, IN ANY FORM, AT ANY TIME POWER OF A JUDGE TO PUT QUESTIONS TO ANY WITNESS, IN ANY FORM, AT ANY TIME Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides for the power of a judge to put questions to any witness according to…
REPORTABLE Authority for Advance Rulings (Income Tax) & Ors Versus Tiger Global International II Holdings CIVIL APPEAL NO. 262 OF 2026[Arising out of SLP (C) No. 2640 OF 2025] DATE OF JUDGMENT-15 JANUARY 2026 BRIEF FACTS- The present appeals arise from a final judgment and common order dated 28.08.2024 passed by the High Court of…
RADHEY SHYAM & ANR. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 3559/2026 Introduction On 18 May 2026, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant order in Radhey Shyam & Anr. v. Assistant Commissioner, granting bail to the petitioners—senior executives of M/s Future Maker Life Care Pvt. Ltd.—in connection with allegations of large‑scale tax…
M/S TRILLION LEAD FACTORY PRIVATE LTD VERSUSSUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7101/2026 Date of Judgment-27.02.2026 HEADNOTE- Writ Against Show Cause Notice – Not Maintainable- A writ petition challenging the issuance of a show cause notice under GST law is not maintainable, as judicial intervention at this stage is impermissible. Petition is…
REPORTABLE Authority for Advance Rulings (Income Tax) & Ors Versus Tiger Global International II Holdings…
RADHEY SHYAM & ANR. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 3559/2026 Introduction On…
M/S TRILLION LEAD FACTORY PRIVATE LTD VERSUSSUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).…
INTRODUCTION:- This Article aims to provide the recent rulings of High Court on quashing of…
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT WRIT TAX NO. 5924 OF 2025 M/S ANIL ART AND CRAFT VERSUS …
RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…