Case Name: M/s. The Poona Club Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA- 123/2019-20/B-12
Date of Judgement/Order: 31/01/2022
Therefore, in view of the amended Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, we find that the applicant club and its members are distinct persons and the fees received by the applicant, from its members are nothing but consideration received for supply of goods/services as a separate entity. The principles of mutuality, which has been cited by the applicant to support its contention that it is not rendering any supply to its members and GST is not leviable on the fees collected from its members, is not applicable in view of the amended Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, the applicant has to pay GST on the said amounts received from its members.
Question 1: – Whether membership fee collected from members at the time of giving membership is liable to tax under CGST/SGST Act?
Answer: – Answered in the affirmative.
Question 2: – Whether the annual subscription and annual games fee collected from members of club is liable to tax under CGST/SGST Act?
Answer: – Answered in the affirmative.
जानिए अतीत की दण्ड व्यवस्था क्या थी |Know what was the punishment system of the past in india भारत में दण्ड के विकास की यात्रा अत्यंत लम्बी है | भारत की दण्ड व्यवस्था के निर्मम एवं बर्बर दण्ड से परिवीक्षा एवं भर्तसना जैसे सुधारात्मक दण्ड तक का सफ़र तय किया है | अतीत की दण्ड…
POWER OF A JUDGE TO PUT QUESTIONS TO ANY WITNESS, IN ANY FORM, AT ANY TIME POWER OF A JUDGE TO PUT QUESTIONS TO ANY WITNESS, IN ANY FORM, AT ANY TIME Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides for the power of a judge to put questions to any witness according to…
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX NO.-1915 of 2025 M/S IMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS Date of Judgment: OCTOBER 7, 2025 HEADNOTE- In Writ Tax No. 1915 of 2025, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad held that cancellation of GST registration passed through an ex-parte…
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT WRIT TAX NO. 5924 OF 2025 M/S ANIL ART AND CRAFT VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. HEADNOTE- GST Registration – Cancellation – Requirement of Reasoned Order -Cancellation of GST registration cannot be sustained when the authority merely records that the reply is “not satisfactory” without assigning reasons. A non-speaking order…
RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICES TAX Case Title- M/s Wolkem Industries Limited (GST AAR RAJASTHAN) Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2018-19/39 Date of Judgment/Order- 25th March 2019 IMPORTANT PARAGRAPHS Para No. 2. QUESTIONS ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHTa. What is…
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX NO.-1915 of 2025 M/S IMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE …
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT WRIT TAX NO. 5924 OF 2025 M/S ANIL ART AND CRAFT VERSUS …
RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…