Uncategorized

Amendment Required to the GST Rate Schedule For Goods

I. The following amendments or additions are required to be made to the aforesaid document:

1.In S.No.22,-

(a) In the Nil rate column, the entry “Tender coconut water put in unit container and carry a registered brand name [2202 90 90]”, may be read as:

“Tender coconut water other than put in unit container and carry a registered brand name [2202 90 90]”.

(b)  In 12% rate column, in the entry “Fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks [22029030]”,tariff item 2202 90 30 may be read as 2202 90 20.

2.  In S.No.85, in the 28% rate column, the entry “Electrical machines and equipment having individual functions, not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter

[8543]” may be omitted.“8543 Electrical machines and apparatus having individual 

functions, not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter” is already covered in the 18% rate column.

3. In the footnote below the Table which gives the list of goods for which the GST rates are yet to be decided by the GST Council, the following entries may be added:

(i) Cereals and flour put up in unit container and bearing a registered brand name.

(ii) Puja samagri including havan samagri will be under Nil category. However, the exact formulation for the same is yet to be finalised.

CA Omprakash Saini

Education:- M.Com, CA Practice- Chartered Accountant

Share
Published by
CA Omprakash Saini

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

3 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

3 months ago