Corporate Law

After death of a partner can his wife or his legal heir be a partner of that partnership firm As per Partnership Act 1932? ||Section 42(C) of Partnership Act

Section 42(C) of Partnership Act 1932 talks about ‘Dissolution of firm on the death of a partner.’

If there is no contract to the contrary then partnership firm automatically dissolves on the death of a partner.

Section 42 mentions certain contingencies of which the firm is dissolved, unless there is a contract to the coutray. Unlike the dissolution under section 41, which is compulsory, the dissolution contemplated under section 42 is not compulsory,

Section 42 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932

Dissolution for partnership firm on the happening of certain contingencies.—Subject to contract between the partners a partnership firm is dissolved,

(a) Expiration of the partnership term– if constituted for a fixed term, by the expiry of that term;

(b) Completion of the adventure -if constituted to carry out one or more adventures or undertakings, by the completion thereof as per partnership deed ;

(c)  Death of a partner – by the death of a partner; and

(d) Insolvency of a partner -by the adjudication of a partner as an insolvent.

(If you liked the Article, please Subscribe )

[email-subscribers namefield=”YES” desc=”” group=”Public”]

Advocate Birbal Sharma

Education- M.Com, LL.B, DLL, LLM Practice Courts - Rajasthan High Court, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Intellectual Property Right Attorney Contact Number- 09785037216 Email ID-advocatebirbalsharma@gmail.com

Share
Published by
Advocate Birbal Sharma

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

1 month ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

3 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

3 months ago