GST Case Law

PDCOR’S PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EXEMPT FROM GST, RULES RAJASTHAN AAR

PDCOR’S PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EXEMPT FROM GST, RULES RAJASTHAN AAR

RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Case Title- M/s PDCOR Limited

(GST AAR RAJASTHAN)

Advance Ruling No.RAJ/AAR/2018-19/13

Date of Judgment/Order- 25th August 2018

IMPORTANT PARAGRAPHS

The Issue raised by M/s PDCOR LIMITED (hereinafter referred as the applicant also) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under ambit of the Section 97 (2) (a), it is given as under:
(a) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(b) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;

Further, the applicant being a registered person, GSTIN is 08AABCP4431G1ZN, as per the declaration given by him in Form ARA-01, the issue raised by the applicant is neither pending for proceedings nor proceedings were passed by any authority. Based on the above observations, the application is admitted’ to pronounce advance ruling.

Para No. 1. SUBMISSION OF THE APPLICANT:
(a) The applicant having Goods and Service Tax (GST) Registration Number 08AABCP4431G1ZN is a joint venture company (50:50) of IL & FS and Government of Rajasthan.
(b) Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) Government of Rajasthan has signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) dated 1-9-2017 for a period of 12 Months for “Project Management Consulting Services (PMCs) for Rejuvenation of Amanishah Nallah (Dravyavati River), Jaipur, Rajasthan including Area Development.” (herein after referred as the project also)
(c) The applicant will provide PMC services to JDA regarding the works being carried out by TATA Projects Ltd. in relation to “Rejuvenation of Amanishah Nallah (Dravyavati River), Jaipur”. The agreement between TATA Projects Ltd. and JDA was executed on 18** of March, 2016.
(d) In this instant case, the applicant is concerned whether the PMC services to JDA for Rejuvenation of Amanishah Nallah (Dravyavati River), Jaipur will attract GST or will be exempt from GST as per Serial No. 3 of CGST Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28″ of June,2017?.

RULING

1. The PMC Services provided by M/s PDCOR Ltd. to the JDA in the “Project Management Consulting Services (PMCs) for Rejuvenation of Amanishah Nallah (Dravyavati River), Jaipur” are correctly classified under SAC Code 9983.
2. Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) is a Governmental Authority.
3. The PMC Services provided by M/s PDCOR Ltd. to JDA under the «”Project Management Consulting Services (PMCs) for Rejuvenation of Amanishah Nallah (Dravyavati River), Jaipur awarded to them vides their MOA dated: 01.09.2017 are covered under SI. No.3 of GST under Notification 12 /2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 (Notification No. F.12 (56) FD/Tax/2017-Pt-I-50 Dated 29/09/2017 issued by the Government of Rajasthan.) and hence exempt from GST.

 

(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Share
Published by
(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Recent Posts

GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Without Reasons or Hearing: Court Affirms Due Process

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD   WRIT TAX NO.-1915 of 2025 M/S IMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE  …

4 weeks ago

High Court Quashes GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Speaking Order

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT  WRIT TAX NO. 5924 OF 2025 M/S ANIL ART AND CRAFT  VERSUS …

4 weeks ago

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

3 months ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

3 months ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

3 months ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

4 months ago