GST Case Law

NO GST ON ASSET TRANSFER- RRVPNL CORRIGENDUM CLARIFIES TAX ON INFRASTRUCTURE COST ONLY

NO GST ON ASSET TRANSFER- RRVPNL CORRIGENDUM CLARIFIES TAX ON INFRASTRUCTURE COST ONLY

RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Case Title- M/s Wonder Cement Limited

(GST AAR RAJASTHAN)

Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2019-20/22

Date of Judgment/Order- 10th October 2019

IMPORTANT PARAGRAPHS

Para No. 2. OUESTIONS ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT:

  • Whether there is any ‘Asset Transfer’ involved which is a leviable to GST in the work of shifting & raising of transmission lines owned by RRVPNL by M/S Wonder Cement Ltd.?
  • Without prejudice to the submissions made above, if there is an ‘Asset transfer’ which is a Supply under GST, then who is liable to pay GST?
  • If above GST is to be paid by the Applicant, then the same will be exempt vide Entry 4 of Notification no. 12/2017- Central Tax (rate) dated 28.06.2017?

Para No. 5 FINDINGS, ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION:

  • The Superintending Engineer (T & C), RRVPNL, Chittorgarh, has issued a Corrigendum Letter No. RVPN/SE/T&C/COR/TECH/ F./D.973 dated 24.09.2019 in which the words “GST @ 18% applicable on asset transfer should be read as the words “GST @ 18% applicable on cost of Infrastructure for ‘Value of Supply’ “.
  • After issue of the said corrigendum the question raised by the applicant turned redundant and therefore no advance ruling is required to be given.

RULING

Since the issue raised by the applicant is no more in existence after issuance of Corrigendum by RRVPNL, no advance ruling is given.

(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Share
Published by
(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Recent Posts

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

6 days ago

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

2 weeks ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON PRE-IMPORT CONDITIONS & IGST EXEMPTIONS

SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON PRE-IMPORT CONDITIONS AND IGST EXEMPTIONS: SUPREME COURT  REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON THE LEVY OF GST ON OCEAN FREIGHT: GST COUNCIL RECOMENDATIONS

SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON THE LEVY OF GST ON OCEAN FREIGHT: GST COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS REPORTABLE…

4 weeks ago

MANPOWER SUPPLY UNDER SAC 99851 NOT EXEMPT – ONLY FARM LABOUR UNDER HEADING 9986 ELIGIBLE

MANPOWER SUPPLY UNDER SAC 99851 NOT EXEMPT – ONLY FARM LABOUR UNDER HEADING 9986 ELIGIBLE…

4 weeks ago