Rajasthan AAR

GST NOT APPLICABLE UNDER ENTRY 195B FOR SPRINKLER PARTS: RAJASTHAN AAR

GST NOT APPLICABLE UNDER ENTRY 195B FOR SPRINKLER PARTS: RAJASTHAN AAR

RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Case Title- M/s Laxmi Agrotech Steel

(GST AAR RAJASTHAN)

Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2019-20/03

Date of Judgment/Order- 16th April 2019

IMPORTANT PARAGRAPHS

Para No. 2. QUESTIONS ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT
Whether parts of sprinkler system sold by us like Latch Clamp, C-Clamp, Foot Batten, Riser Pipe, Aluminum Rivet and Mini Sprinkler Rod etc. exclusively meant for use in Sprinklers and drip irrigation system but sold in isolation as parts and not as a complete system under the heading 8424 and the tax rate applicable on such components/parts when sold separately and not as a part of the sprinkler/drip irrigation?

Para No. 3. PERSONAL HEARING
In the matter personal hearing was granted to the applicant on 03.04.2019 at Room no. 2.29 NCRB, Statue Circle, Jaipur. Shri Parshant Sharma (Authorised Representative) of applicant appeared for PH. During the PH, he reiterated the submissions already made in the application. He further requested that the case may be decided at the earliest.

RULING

The metal parts manufactured and supplied by the applicant will not be covered under Entry No. 195B of Schedule II of Notification No.01/2017 dated 28.06.2017.

(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Share
Published by
(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

2 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

2 months ago