Para No. 2. QUESTIONS ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT
Whether parts of sprinkler system sold by us like Latch Clamp, C-Clamp, Foot Batten, Riser Pipe, Aluminum Rivet and Mini Sprinkler Rod etc. exclusively meant for use in Sprinklers and drip irrigation system but sold in isolation as parts and not as a complete system under the heading 8424 and the tax rate applicable on such components/parts when sold separately and not as a part of the sprinkler/drip irrigation?
Para No. 3. PERSONAL HEARING
In the matter personal hearing was granted to the applicant on 03.04.2019 at Room no. 2.29 NCRB, Statue Circle, Jaipur. Shri Parshant Sharma (Authorised Representative) of applicant appeared for PH. During the PH, he reiterated the submissions already made in the application. He further requested that the case may be decided at the earliest.
The metal parts manufactured and supplied by the applicant will not be covered under Entry No. 195B of Schedule II of Notification No.01/2017 dated 28.06.2017.
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…
Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…
Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…
SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON PRE-IMPORT CONDITIONS AND IGST EXEMPTIONS: SUPREME COURT REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME…
SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON THE LEVY OF GST ON OCEAN FREIGHT: GST COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS REPORTABLE…
MANPOWER SUPPLY UNDER SAC 99851 NOT EXEMPT – ONLY FARM LABOUR UNDER HEADING 9986 ELIGIBLE…