Para No. 2 QUESTIONS ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT
Whether M/S Mahindra World City (a developer) who has taken the entire land from state of Rajasthan to further lease out to Industrial units (applicant is one of the industrial unit) is liable to charge GST on the lease amount?
Para No. 5 FINDINGS, ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION:
Shri Manoj Mohanty and Shri Harish Kumar Dixit (Authorised Representatives) of applicant appeared for PH. During the PH, they requested to withdraw their advance ruling application and submitted an application dated 04.07.2019 in this regard.
Since the applicant has withdrawn the application, therefore no ruling is given.
RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…
Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…
Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…