MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING RULED THAT INPUT TAX CREDIT CANNOT BE CLAIMED ON INDIRECT EXPENSES LIKE RENT, COMMISSION, PROFESSIONAL FEES, TELEPHONE INCURRED FOR PURPOSEOF BUSINESS.

MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING RULED THAT INPUT TAX CREDIT CANNOT BE CLAIMED ON INDIRECT EXPENSES LIKE RENT, COMMISSION, PROFESSIONAL FEES, TELEPHONE INCURRED FOR PURPOSE OF BUSINESS

MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING

Case Name : Deccan Wheels (GST AAR Maharashtra)

Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-103/2019-20/B-81
Date of Judgement/Order : 25th October 2021

Question:- Can we claim Input Tax Credit on other indirect expenses incurred for the purpose of business such as rent, commission, professional fees, telephone etc.?

Contents

MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING RULED THAT INPUT TAX CREDIT CANNOT BE CLAIMED ON INDIRECT EXPENSES LIKE RENT, COMMISSION, PROFESSIONAL FEES, TELEPHONE INCURRED FOR PURPOSE OF BUSINESS MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING Case Name : Deccan Wheels (GST AAR Maharashtra)Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-103/2019-20/B-81 Date of Judgement/Order : 25th October 2021

Answer:– Answered in the negative.

Judgment copy
Deccan Wheels (GST AAR Maharashtra)Download

(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Next INPUT TAX CREDIT NOT ADMISSIBLE ON CONSTRUCTION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY USED FOR BUSINESS »

Previous « ITC NOT ELIGIBLE OF GST ON INPUT & INPUT SERVICES USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL IMMOVABLE PROPERTY, SUBSEQUENTLY USED FOR RENTING

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

2 weeks ago

GST Case Law

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

2 weeks ago

GST Case Law

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

2 weeks ago

Income Tax Case Law

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Criminal Law

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

2 months ago

Income Tax Case Law

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

2 months ago

MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING RULED THAT INPUT TAX CREDIT CANNOT BE CLAIMED ON INDIRECT EXPENSES LIKE RENT, COMMISSION, PROFESSIONAL FEES, TELEPHONE INCURRED FOR PURPOSEOF BUSINESS.