GST Case Law

GST AAR HARYANA:- GST LIABLE ON SUPPLY OF DOCTORS TO HOSPITAL

GST AAR HARYANA:- GST LIABLE ON SUPPLY OF DOCTORS TO HOSPITAL

HARYANA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING

FOR GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Case Name: ARPK Healthcare Private Limited (GST AAR Haryana)   

Appeal Number: Advance Ruling No. HR/HAAR/07/2022-23

Date of Judgement/Order: 12th January 2023

CONCLUSION

The authority is of view that the scope of supply under the GST Act is quite vast and covers all aspects of the nature of supplies. And the said supply which is to be made between the applicant and M/s Asian Hospital is duly covered under the definition of the scope of supply, hence taxable under the Act. So, it can be said that the claim of the applicant that the services rendered by the applicant to M/s Asian Hospital is covered under the Notification No. 12/2017 -CENTRAL TAX (RATE) Dt. 28/06/2017 is not sustainable rather it falls under the taxable supply of services by a company/ legal entity to an another company/hospital.

RULING

Questions 1. Whether Fee/ charges received by M/s ARPK from M/s Asian is exempt under GST?

Answers: – No

Questions No 2. Whether Fee/charges for Health Care Services received by M/s Asian is exempt under GST.

Answers: – Yes except for the services mentioned under heading 9993 clause no. 31A vide Notification 03/2022-Central Tax(Rate) dated 13.07.2022.

(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

2 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

2 months ago