The main business of the applicant is manufacture of apparel and they are not engaged in the business of bus transportation. The transportation services is not a supply for the applicant made in the course or furtherance of business and the recoveries made by the applicant from their employees does not fall under the definition of supply under Section 7. Further, the transportation services are being supplies by the third-party to the applicant and they are receiver and not supplier of the same. Therefore, it can be concluded that the GST is not applicable for the recoveries from the employees for the transportation services provided to them.
(Under Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
Question 1: Whether GST would be applicable on the amount recovered from employees for canteen facility provided to them?
Answer: Negative
Question 2: Whether GST would be applicable on the amount recovered from employees for transportation facilities provided to them?
Answer: Negative
Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under Section 99 of APGST Act, 2017, with in a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…
Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…
Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…
SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON PRE-IMPORT CONDITIONS AND IGST EXEMPTIONS: SUPREME COURT REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME…
SUPREME COURT FINDINGS ON THE LEVY OF GST ON OCEAN FREIGHT: GST COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS REPORTABLE…
MANPOWER SUPPLY UNDER SAC 99851 NOT EXEMPT – ONLY FARM LABOUR UNDER HEADING 9986 ELIGIBLE…