GST Case Law

FAILING TO COMPLETE PART ‘B’ OF E-WAY BILL WITHOUT TAX EVASION INTENT: HC QUASHES PENALTY

FAILING TO COMPLETE PART ‘B’ OF E-WAY BILL WITHOUT TAX EVASION INTENT: HC QUASHES PENALTY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
ALLAHABAD

Roli Enterprises
Vs
State of U.P. And 2 Others

Appeal Number: Writ Tax No. – 937 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order: 16th January 2024

BRIEF FACTS

The Allahabad High Court has delivered a judgment in the case of Roli enterprises v. State of U.P. & Ors. where the petitioner challenged a penalty levied under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The penalty was imposed for the non-completion of Part ‘B’ of the e-Way Bill.

IMPORTANT POINTS

Point No:- 7. In the present case, the facts are quite similar to one in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.’s case (supra) and I see no reason why this Court should take a different view of the matter, as the invoice itself contained the details of the truck and the error committed by the petitioner was of a technical nature only and without any intention to evade tax. Once this fact has been substantiated, there was no requirement to levy penalty under Section 129(3) of the Act.

Point No:- 8. In light of the above, the orders dated November 10, 2020 and January 10, 2022 are quashed and set aside the petition is allowed. Consequential reliefs to follow. The respondents are directed to return the security to the petitioner within six weeks.

(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Share
Published by
(Team) LTG Publication Private Limited

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

2 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

2 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

2 months ago