Corporate Law

Case Study on Exemption from personal appearance (Accused) 138 NI Act

Case Study on  Exemption from personal appearance (Accused) 138 NI Act

 “Taking into account the position of law explained in the above mentioned cases and the circumstances brought forth on record of this case, I find merit in the stand taken on behalf of the petitioner. Undisputedly the petitioner has been residing in Aurangabad  Maharashtra state  which is at a distance of 1800 kms. from District  Abohar state of Punjab,.
accused/ petitioner is also aged 64 years and is presently without any job and it takes about 6 days journey period to attend Court  on every date of hearing at the expenses stated by him. The petitioner shall be granted exemption from personal appearance subject to his furnishing an undertaking before the Trial Court that his Counsel shall be present on his behalf on the case date when the case is called and evidence is recorded and that he would not dispute his identity as an accused in this case and would be present in the Court as and when his presence is imperatively needed.” Arun D. Deshpande vs Vipin Oil Extraction (P) Ltd 2001 (2) D.C.R 32 Panjab and Hariyana

Other Post Related to Section 138 of NI Act

Advocate Birbal Sharma

Education- M.Com, LL.B, DLL, LLM Practice Courts - Rajasthan High Court, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Intellectual Property Right Attorney Contact Number- 09785037216 Email ID-advocatebirbalsharma@gmail.com

Share
Published by
Advocate Birbal Sharma

Recent Posts

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT

RAJASTHAN AAR CLARIFIES 18% GST ON MINING ROYALTY PAID TO STATE GOVERNMENT RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF LEVY GST ON LOTTERIES: SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL V. UNION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF ARREST PROVISIONS UNDER CUSTOM AND GST ACT: RADHIKA AGARWAL…

3 weeks ago

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES DEPRECIATION ON NON-COMPETE FEE U/S 32(1)(ii) OF INCOME TAX ACT REPORTBALE SUPREME…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Cataloguing Witnesses and Documentary Evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar Case

Supreme Court issues directions for Cataloguing witnesses and documentary evidences in Criminal Trial: Manojbhai Jethabhai…

2 months ago

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction Cap Prescribed u/s 44C: Supreme Court

Head Office Expenditure of Non-Resident Companies in Relation to Indian Business Subject to the Deduction…

2 months ago